Monday, December 28, 2009

Are we sure assurance should be sought for?

[To S]

Luther's whole theology was driven by the question of how he could be assured of God's favour - how he could know that he was saved. He even defined faith as including assurance of salvation.

Our theology is shaped by the questions we asked. Was that the wrong question for Luther to be asking? Should we expect Christians to be sure of their salvation? Perhaps it is even unhelpful.

In contemporary Evangelicalism you could often assume that good emotions, and positive feelings are the primary purpose of all Christian activities. So we don't even think if there is anything wrong with Luther's question. But it is a question we should ask. Why is assurance of salvation essential to Christian faith?

Off the top of my head I would give two answers:

  1. It honours God as truthful. To not be assured of your salvation is to call God a liar, because he promises just that in the Bible, the words of Christians, and the sacraments. "when the soul firmly trusts God's promises, it regards him as truthful and righteous. Nothing more excellent than this can be ascribed to God [this is the] very highest worship of God" (Martin Luther, The Freedom of the Christian).
  2. It is the only way anyone will do good works. We will never be motivated to do truly good works by mere command, even less by fear. Unless we are sure that we have all that we need we will look first to shoring up our own salvation, before seeking to serve others. Unless we know for sure that God loves us we will not love him in return. A few quotes:

"For what reason is faith, as trust in God's promise [of our forgiveness], given priority over all works? In what way does it alone make all works good? Because it alone - and thus God alone, who establishes faith - breaks open the nature of the sinner as one curved in on himself; only he can loosen the fist that is clenched so tightly, so that my existence on behalf of others becomes natural once again and takes place with 'passion and love.' The imagery of receiving and passing on to others brings us to the foundational motif of Luther's understanding of God, that of categorical gift: through the Son, God in the Spirit gives himself to us as Father, in every sense of the word, so that we do not hoard and keep for ourselves what is given to us, which is what we do as sinners, but instead pass it on to others" (p. 283, Oswald Bayer, Martin Luther's Theology: A Contemporary Interpretation)

"if we recognize the great and precious things which are given us, as Paul says [Rom. 5:5], our hearts will be filled by the Holy Spirit with the love that makes us free, joyful, almighty workers and conquerors over all tribulations, servants of our neighbours, yet lords of all." (pp.304f, Martin Luther, The Freedom of the Christian)

"It is impossible to love God until the forgiveness of sins is first grasped by faith. For the heart that truly believes that God is angry is unable to love God until he is shown to be reconciled. For as long as he terrifies us and appears to be casting us into eternal death, human nature cannot bring itself to love such a wrathful, judging, and punishing God. It is easy for complacent minds to fabricate some foolish dreams about love [...] But in its agony and its battles the conscience experiences the emptiness of such philosophical speculations." (p. 126, Apology of the Augsburg Confession)

6 comments:

  1. This is an interesting post.

    On your two points:

    1. What if God's promise of salvation was through adherence to the teaching of His Church and reception of Her sacraments? To accept this - and thus to do the required work - would not be to distrust God, but rather to trust in His means of salvation.

    2. Psychologically: I have been persuaded to do good deeds because of commands (e.g. parents) and fear (e.g. exams, appraisals with my boss), so I disagree with you that good works will not result from either.
    Biblically: Doesn't the Parable of the Talents suggest fear of judgment as a motive to hard work?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 'interesting', that's an interesting word isn't it? I have no idea what you could mean :-)

    On your two points, which really succinctly cut to the heart of things, I'll less succinctly give some brief thoughts. I've got to be brief though because I need to get some sleep as its a school night for me:

    1. I think its better to say God's promise of salvation is through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, applied by the Holy Spirit who works through the teaching of the church and the administration of the sacraments. There it is the Triune God who acts in salvation. God is our saviour, and we don't save ourselves. When you ask where the burden falls (Christ or us?) the answer is Christ. I think that the NT presents salvation as a done deal in Jesus. That is applied to us through the teaching of the church and the sacraments, and these are not jobs for us to do, but a promise of what has already been done. I think that is more fitting with the NT as it depicts the preaching of the Gospel, and what the sacraments are about (they are always focused on the saving acts of the Triune God it seems to me).

    2. On fear. If we serve our neighbour because of what we get out of it then it seeks to be true service. If it we are motivated by fear then I think that the work itself ceases to be good. It is mercenary. Passages could be listed but I want to finish and go to bed... sorry.
    On commands. I'm persuaded to do good deeds because of commands too. But why do I obey the command? Again if I do it to get something out of it then its mercenary. If I do it to please the person who commands then its good.
    On the Parable of the Talents. I'm not sure that it does suggest fear as a motive. The man who says he is driven by fear buries the talent and does nothing with what he has been given. He is the one who is judged to be wicked.

    Those really pertinent points though Steve, so I may return to them when I have more time.

    BTW. Yes in Cache I understand it was quite a shocking, out of the blue, bit of violence. I'm a bit of wimp with these things.

    ReplyDelete
  3. sorry for the couple of typos.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting reply :-)

    1. I am in almost complete agreement. The Church and the sacraments are the fruit of Christ's sacrifice. This C15 triptych nicely illustrates the point. However, I don't see how we can know in advance (be assured) that we will stay faithful to Christ and his Church. The mentions in the NT of people falling away and the warnings against doing so suggest to me that loss of faith is a real possibility.

    2. We should do good deeds because they are good deeds. Good deeds are those actions done in love. However, it ain't easy being good - and knowing that we live in a moral universe where good is rewarded and bad is punished (ultimately at judgment) can be a motivation to do the right thing. This, I think, is fear of God and it doesn't seem to be viewed negatively in scripture, 2 Cor. 5.11 and surrounding verses is a good example.

    Thanks for your kind words on my last post. I fear that, as well as being curt, I've been stuck near the top of 'the ladder of abstraction' in this reply.

    Best wishes for the new decade!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am going to have to think some more about this, because I don't have a great answer for you.

    I like the painting though.

    I agree we can fall away, but that is no different from the person who never believes. Both HAVE been saved from the wrath to come. Both have an inheritance in Christ, already and guaranteed for the future, but refuse in ehe end to accept it.

    You say: "I don't see how we can know in advance (be assured) that we will stay faithful to Christ and his Church", but that sees us as separate individuals to Christ and the Church. If we are baptised and have faith in Christ then we are "in Christ", and part of his body of the church. We are no longer on our own, but can trust in our our head (Christ), who we are connected to in his body (the Church), to be faithful for us. Our Baptism declares that we have already been faithful, in Christ. That's why when we do fear that we won't be faithful (and we should fear that - as Hebrews says), we should look again and again to Christ who has been faithful for us, been judged already for us, and lives a new resurrection life perfectly for us.

    You're right that fear of judgement "can be a motivation to do the right thing", but the thing itself is still tainted by the motivation I think. Also, I think I've set up the question in an unhelpful way because 'good works' is not our first goal but to become 'good people' is. Change of people is harder to achieve - and I think psychologically (or at least according to the pop psychology I could spout) the only thing that break us open from beings turned in on ourself to beings looking to others, is love, not fear.

    2 Cor 5 is one I've been struggling with for a couple of months. In fact, fear of God is something I've been thinking about for a few months and I still don't feel I really understand its role in the Christian life properly (see my struggling here).

    Will continue thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks, Dave. I thought Marilyne Robinson in the interview you posted also had interesting things to say motives for doing good.

    ReplyDelete