Showing posts with label Films. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Films. Show all posts

Saturday, June 04, 2011

The Tree of Life

This new film directed by Terrence Malick, and starring Brad Pitt, Jessica Chastain and Sean Penn, looks exciting.

The film follows the life journey of the eldest son, Jack, through the innocence of childhood to his disillusioned adult years as he tries to reconcile a complicated relationship with his father. Jack finds himself a lost soul in the modern world, seeking answers to the origins and meaning of life while questioning the existence of faith. Through Malick's signature imagery, we see how both brute nature and spiritual grace shape not only our lives as individuals and families, but all life.

I suspect that I won't understand it though! The reviews suggest it is a bit mysterious, and given the director I'm not surprised. His Wikipedia's page includes this gem:

Malick studied philosophy under Stanley Cavell at Harvard University... He went on to Magdalen College, Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar. After a disagreement with his tutor, Gilbert Ryle, over his thesis on the concept of world in Kierkegaard, Heidegger, and Wittgenstein, Malick left Oxford without a doctorate degree.

Sunday, December 27, 2009

My films of 2009

One of the wonders of living in York is the City Screen cinema by the river. I love this cinema, and saw a good few films there this year.

Its review of the year time, but sadly 2009 hasn't been a vintage year for filmgoers. Nevertheless, for your consideration, here are my top ten films I watched at the cinema in 2009:

1. Slumdog Millionaire
2. The Wrestler
3= Doubt
3= Away We Go
5. Up (3D)
6= Revolutionary Road
6= Gran Torino
8. Star Trek
9. Das Weisse Band - The White Ribbon
10. Moon

With an honourable mention to Synecdoche, New York.

There have been some great films that I've missed. But so you know the sample I'm basing this on. Here are all the films I saw at the cinema this year:

(500) Days of Summer
A serious man
Away We Go
Breakfast at Tiffany's (rerelease)
Che - Part One
Das Weisse Band - The White Ribbon
District 9
Doubt
Frost/Nixon
Gomorra / Gomorrah
Gran Torino
Harry Potter And The Half Blood Prince
Milk
Moon
Revolutionary Road
Slumdog Millionaire
Star Trek
State Of Play
Synecdoche, New York
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Wrestler
Up (3D)
Vicky Cristina Barcelona
Where the Wild Things Are

Sunday, December 20, 2009

The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe film discussion questions

[These are my notes for leading a discussion on the film The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Feedback welcome. Sorry for the extent that they're decipherable only to me. I haven't had time to edit them for public consumption]

From dedication of the book: "My Dear Lucy, I wrote this story for you, but when I began it I had not realized that girls grow quicker than books. As a result you are already too old for fairy tales, and by the time it is printed and bound you will be older still. But some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again. You can then take it down from some upper shelf, dust it, and tell me what you think of it. I shall probably be too deaf to hear, and too old to understand a word you say, but I shall still be your affectionate Godfather, C. S. Lewis."

We're a bunch of adults who have decided to watch a 'kids' film, involving talking animals and a secret other world. Is Lewis right that you grow out of fairy tales, and then grow into them again? Why?

  • Escapism?
  • Sentimental longing to relive childhood?
  • Do they enable us to understand the real world in a way which realist fiction or abstract argument can't?

** WATCH FILM **

Any parts of the film you particularly enjoyed, or thought didn't work?

  • Tilda Swinton
  • Colours of Narnia, particularly when Lucy and Edmund first enter. Snow.
  • Soundtrack
  • London scenes. Character development. Parallels of war in England and Narnia.
  • Why Aslan had to die.

Once all four children enter Narnia, it is largely the actions of Edmund that drive the story. What motivates Edmund to join the White Witch?

  • Absence of his father (running back to save his photo in air raid; "Wouldn’t have to go away if Dad was here" at station). Does this excuse him?
  • Book: new school is blamed
  • Estrangement from siblings, in particular from Peter.
  • Problem with authority: Doesn't like authority of Peter and Susan over him ("You think you’re Dad, but you’re not" when Peter tells him off for mocking Lucy’s belief in Narnia; "Yes Mum" his response to Susan when she suggests they go to bed)
  • Desire to be king (Doesn't like it when he thinks Witch will make Peter king as well; sits on Witch's throne: “like it?” she asks - “yes” Edmund replies).
  • Half-believes she is right (thinks that faun may be lying about her, that and that it is Tumnus who is a criminal).
  • Enjoys the Turkish Delight and wants more (book: "this was enchanted Turkish Delight and... anyone who had tasted it would want more and more of it, and would even, if tthey were allowed go on eating it till they killed themselves")
  • In the end he doesn't get anything that he betrayed his family for. No throne, no food.

If Edmund is flawed, is Peter any better?

  • self-righteous
  • quick to round on Edmund at any opportunity (gets angry at air raid about photo Edmund goes back for, gets angry about cricket ball, gives Edmund girls coat out of wardrobe, "I know")
  • He likes authority too. Not happy to ask Professor for help, "we can handle it".
  • Confession to Aslan: "It’s my fault really. I was too hard on him"

Aslan sacrifices himself to save Edmund. Self sacrifice is a common theme in films. The centaur and rhino sacrifice themselves in this film to save Peter. Is Aslan's self-sacrifice different in any way?

  • Planned? No, it is often planned in stories.
  • He is in control though in a way that you don't often get. He has to satisfy the Deep Magic. That is the problem, not the Witch.
  • Only he could "turn death backwards", be resurrected, break the Deep Magic's hold over Narnia, because he is the only innocent one - and god?
  • Why does he have to die? What does it achieve?

[OPTIONAL QUESTION: Tilda Swinton says about the film: "It's about finding self-sufficiency in difficult circumstances and finding the capacity to dig deep, survive and prevail."

Is her interpretation of the film correct?

  • Yes, digging deep and courage important themes.
  • No, self-sufficiency is far from promoted (Children need each other and other animals, need Aslan - “Only Aslan can help your brother now” Mr Beaver on Edmund going to the witch’s palace, Aslan's desire not to be alone as he goes to his death, contrast the Witch who needs no-one and doesn't want to - even says to dwarf who asks if she will kill him: "not yet"). We are created to need others, and particularly to need Christ (and his death). Self-sufficiency is not an ideal to aspire to.

]

Running theme in film is who is telling the truth. Lucy and Edmund contradict on existence of Narnia. Lucy: "She calls herself the Queen of Narnia thought she has no right to be queen at all". Faun has book on his shelf "Is Man a Myth?" Edmund on Mr Beaver: "how do we know we can trust him?" What does film say about how we can know what is true?

  • Edmund at least really knows in deep-down that witch is evil. He lies to himself.
  • The Professor's advice to Peter and Susan on whether to believe Lucy: "If she’s not mad and if she’s not lying then she must be telling the truth"
  • Ultimately, belief in truth is presented in a very personal way.
  • Some are ignorant of truth so doubt it ("Is man a myth?").
  • Truth is inescapable reality whatever stance people take.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Top ten films I saw in 2008

This list is more for me than anyone else. But I would strongly recommend that everyone see number 1 on the list. I really do believe it is a genuine masterpiece. (Watch it on a big screen if you can.)

  1. There Will be Blood
  2. No Country For Old Men
  3. Wall-E
  4. Juno
  5. The Dark Knight
  6. Changeling
  7. The Duchess
  8. Sweeney Todd
  9. Burn after Reading
  10. Iron Man

Saturday, August 02, 2008

The Dark Knight and Wall-E

Reviews of The Dark Knight to make you think:

  • Peter Dray: are we 'able to keep to our own moral frameworks, particularly when placed under intense pressure'? and is vigilantism a moral response to evil?
  • Chris Oldfield: action is absurd but everything, chance is fairness. The joker resembles Nietzsche's madman, who has seen the consequences of the death of God.
  • Mark Kermode: one moral set piece too many, one character too many.

I'm still waiting for the similarly thoughtful reviews of Wall-E, so I'll try my hand at the film reviewing lark myself.... SPOILERS ALERT.. I'll assume readers have seen the film (because you should).

I love Pixar films and this one is exceptional. In contrast to The Dark Knight it was beautiful in it's simplicity, although it had plenty of ideas of it's own. Bizarrely it had both a very positive and very negative view of humanity. In the future humanity is lazy to the point that they never stand up and communicate with each other only through screens. They drift (literally) through life not creating but only consuming passively what the all dominant faceless corporation tells them to. However, everyone is very polite to each other and the robots, and once forced to question the direction of their lives they come up with the 'right answer' immediately, setting their faces to renewing the world they had abandoned as a garbage heap.

The morality behind the film is not hard to discern and some reviewers have found it to grate a little. Clearly, we should all care for the environment and our bodies. Who is going to disagree with that! However, most reviewers have stopped there and so had problems linking the first half of the film on Earth with the second in space. But to me the two halves are essential to the film as a whole. To have missed out the second half (as Mark Kermode would have liked) would have led to missing out the central theme of the film.

Wall-E after 700 years on earth has exceeded his programming and discovered what is most important. He values other things (as art), other people (or at least cockroaches) and he values himself (repairing himself while all his brothers died). He is really living, but longing to share his life with another. With Eve he finds the love that he has been longing for and doggedly pursues her because of this. This brings Wall-E and Eve together on the human ship where they show the humans how to be truly human. The humans enthusiastically embrace this new (or old) kind of life that they have forgotten and the charming titles at the end show them repeating the creative achievements of the last 2000 years.

By the end of Wall-E the relationships between humans and creation have been healed and humanity is (unconsciously) imaging our creative and caring God again. It is a beautiful, fantastical film. But it is fantastical. Wall-E depicts humans as having drifted out of the way they were made to live, but having now learnt their lesson.

I see much to love in the message of Wall-E. However, I know that our drifting into sin is not entirely unintentional, and our turning from it is not as easy. I also know that as long as our primary relationship to our Father is broken we cannot fix our relationships with each other or creation.

We can't rely on robots to save humanity and then show us the way to live. We need a more powerful saviour, a better example to follow and new heart to enable us to do it. We also need to experience that greater love, and greater relationship that we were made for; and until we do we will be like Wall-E watching old VHS videos but longing for the reality.

Sunday, December 23, 2007

My films of the year

Why bother posting this? I don't know but I thought it would be fun to look through the films released this year and list those I particularly liked. Here it is in a very rough order:

  1. Last king of Scotland - thriller set in Uganda which earned Forest Whitaker an Oscar for his portrayal of Idi Amin.
  2. Letters from Iwo Jima - American film in Japanese, showing a little of the horror and the honour of the WW2 battle.
  3. Ratatouille - perfect Pixar.
  4. Notes on a Scandal - uncomfortable, but scarily good acting from Cate Blanchett and Judi Dench.
  5. Blood Diamond - Leonardo DiCaprio, a fake African in a fake Africa, but a good film nonetheless.
  6. The Bourne Ultimatum - Difficult to imagine better action, although the plot was lacking somewhat.
  7. The Lives Of Others - Humanity in the Stasi.
  8. Becoming Jane - I had low expectations but I actually really believed in James McAvoy and Anne Hathaway.
  9. Michael Clayton - George Clooney plays a fixer for dirty big law firm who a nasty big corporation wrongly decide to try kill instead of pay off.
  10. Once - Sort of an Irish indie film about music, love and what could have been.

I saw quite a bit this year thanks to Orange Wednesdays, but missed a lot too.

There are only two films I would have to be paid to see a second time:

  • Pirates Of The Caribbean 3: At World's End
  • Babel